一天投十个岗位全部石沉大海，多数时候原因不是提案写得差，是**投错了单**。 而「这单值不值得投」有一半是能机械判定的。把岗位描述整段贴进来（**原样贴，套话本身就是信号**），代码查六项：对方写了预算吗、交付物吗、技术栈吗、时间吗、业务背景吗、验收标准吗。**写得越具体的岗位，发布方越可能是真的准备开工**——他已经想过这件事怎么做，也更可能读完你的提案，而且竞争比的是匹配度不是报价。 同时扫七类典型措辞：「long-term partnership」（用未来替代当下的价格，可以相信但不要为它定价）、「simple task」、无偿试做、「unlimited revisions」、极度紧急而没有预算、明说要 best price（**在按价格排序的岗位上，写得再好的提案也赢不过报价更低的人**）、以及 rockstar／ninja。 还会把你的技能词与岗位描述取交集，告诉你哪几个词**必须原样出现在提案前三行**——对方写 Next.js 你写「React 全家谱」，在扫读时是不匹配的。 然后是提案结构：第一行证明你读过这个岗位（引用一个具体细节），第二行给一个最相关的证据，第三行提一个显示你想过的问题。**提案的目标从来不是成交，是得到一次回复。** 而「我是一名有 8 年经验的开发者」这种开头，消耗的是最贵的那一行。 $3/月不限次——一天判十个岗位，值得的可能只有两个。Ten bids a day into silence usually isn't a writing problem — it's **bidding on the wrong jobs**. And half of "is this worth bidding on" is mechanically checkable. Paste the post whole (**unedited — the boilerplate is itself a signal**) and the code checks six things: did they state a budget, deliverables, a stack, a timeline, business context, acceptance criteria. **The more specific the post, the more likely the client is actually ready to start** — they've thought about the work, they're more likely to read your proposal, and the competition turns on fit rather than price. It also scans for seven telltale phrasings: "long-term partnership" (future possibility substituting for present price — believable, but don't price on it), "simple task", unpaid test work, "unlimited revisions", extreme urgency with no budget, explicit requests for the best price (**where posts sort by price, a better proposal loses to a cheaper one**), and rockstar/ninja. Then it intersects your skills with the post and tells you which words must appear **verbatim in your first three lines** — write "React ecosystem" when they wrote Next.js and you don't match on a skim. Then the structure: line one proves you read this specific post, line two gives your single most relevant proof, line three asks a question that shows you've thought about it. **A proposal's goal is never to close — it's to get a reply.** And "I am a developer with 8 years of experience" spends the most expensive line in the message. $3/month, unlimited — you'll screen ten posts a day and maybe two are worth it.
订阅后不限次：完整提案草稿（前三行钩子 + 匹配证据 + 报价锚定 + 结尾提问）、发布方真实痛点与隐藏筛选条件的提取、报价结构建议（区间与条件怎么写），以及回复之后的第二封该说什么。Unlimited runs: a full proposal draft (hook, matched evidence, price anchor, closing question), extraction of the client's real pain and hidden filters, how to structure a range-plus-conditions price, and what the second message should say once they reply.
完整度分数与「该不该投」是本工具的粗口径参考（每写清一项维度记 14 分、每处需留意的措辞扣 12 分），**不预测你能不能拿到这单**，也不代表发布方的真实意图——写得含糊的好客户和写得完整的坏客户都存在。措辞识别按关键词匹配，会有漏判与误判。本工具不接入任何平台、不代投、不读取你的账号。请勿粘贴发布方的联系方式或平台外交易信息——多数平台禁止绕过平台交易，违反规则可能导致封号。你填写的内容不入库。The completeness score and the bid/skip call are this tool's rough conventions (14 points per stated dimension, minus 12 per flagged phrase). They **do not predict whether you'll win the job** and don't reveal the client's intent — vague posts from good clients and polished posts from bad ones both exist. Phrase detection is keyword-based and both misses and over-flags. This tool connects to no platform, submits nothing, and reads no account of yours. Don't paste client contact details or off-platform arrangements — most platforms prohibit circumvention and it can cost you the account. Nothing you enter is stored.