**各州的柠檬法门槛不一样**——几次算「合理的维修次数」、累计停修多少天、必须发生在购车后多久或多少里程之内、要不要先走厂家的仲裁程序,各州规定都不同,有的州对安全相关缺陷另有更低的次数。 **所以这里一个门槛数字都不给。** 给错了只有两种结果:让你放弃一个本来成立的主张,或者让你为一个不成立的主张浪费半年。 代码算的是**每个州的判定都会用到的那三组事实**: · **同一故障修了几次**——按故障描述归并(变速箱、刹车、电气、异响…),因为同一个问题被写成三种说法,在判定时可能被当成三个不同的问题,而重复次数正是核心; · **累计停修多少天**——区间合并、重叠只算一次; · **首次报修距购车多久**。 这三组数字恰恰是车主自己最难拼出来的,而律师和厂家仲裁看的正是它们。 然后是把记录补成证据的五件事——其中最重要的一条:**口头报修不算数**。打电话说过、或者对方说「先观察看看」没开工单的那几次,在记录上等于没发生。 最后:**即使达不到门槛也不等于没办法**,厂家自己的争议解决程序、联邦层面的保修救济、监管投诉、协商置换都是并行的路。而这类案件在很多州由厂家承担律师费,**首次咨询通常免费**——带着这三组数字去问,得到的答案会具体得多。 $3 解锁维修记录的证据化整理(可提交格式)、给厂家的书面通知信、以及仲裁与索赔材料清单。**Lemon law thresholds differ by state** — what counts as a reasonable number of repair attempts, how many days out of service, within what period or mileage, and whether the manufacturer's arbitration must come first. Some states set lower thresholds for safety-related defects. **So no threshold numbers are given here.** Getting one wrong produces only two outcomes: abandoning a claim that would have succeeded, or spending six months on one that never could. What the code computes are **the three sets of facts every state's test uses**: · **How many times the same defect was repaired** — grouped by complaint type, because one problem written up three different ways can be read as three different problems, and repetition is the core of the test; · **Total days out of service** — overlapping intervals merged; · **How long after purchase the first report came**. These are exactly the numbers owners can't assemble themselves — and exactly what a lawyer or a manufacturer's arbitration panel looks at. Then five things that turn records into evidence, the most important being: **a verbal complaint doesn't count**. Any visit where you phoned, or where they said "let's keep an eye on it" without opening a repair order, effectively didn't happen. Finally: **falling short of a threshold isn't the end** — manufacturer arbitration, federal warranty remedies, safety regulator complaints and negotiated buybacks all run in parallel. And in many states the manufacturer pays the attorney's fees in these cases, so **the first consultation is usually free** — and far more useful once you arrive with these three numbers. $3 unlocks a submission-ready evidence pack, a written notice to the manufacturer, and the arbitration and claim checklist.
把维修记录整理成可提交的证据格式(按故障归并、时间线、停修天数明细)、给制造商的书面通知信模板、仲裁与索赔的材料清单、以及间歇性故障怎么取证。Repair records reorganised into a submission-ready format (grouped by defect, timeline, days-out breakdown), a written notice to the manufacturer, the arbitration and claim checklist, and how to document an intermittent fault.
**本工具不提供法律意见,也不判断你是否符合任何州的柠檬法。** 它只对你自己敲入的日期与描述做归并与算术。**各州(及各国)的门槛、期限、适用车辆类型(新车/二手/租赁)与前置程序差异极大,本工具刻意不提供任何门槛数字或时限**——请以你所在州检察总长办公室、消费者保护部门的官方说明,或执业律师的意见为准。故障归并按描述关键词匹配,是粗口径,可能把不同故障归到一起或把同一故障拆开,请以工单原文为准。请勿依据本工具的输出放弃主张或停止维修记录的积累。若涉及安全缺陷,请同时考虑向车辆安全监管机构报告。你填写的内容不入库。**This is not legal advice and does not determine eligibility under any state's lemon law.** It groups and counts dates and descriptions you type in. **Thresholds, time limits, covered vehicle types (new, used, leased) and prerequisite procedures vary enormously by state and country, and no threshold or deadline is given here, deliberately** — rely on your state attorney general or consumer protection office, or a licensed attorney. Defect grouping is keyword-based and rough; it may merge distinct faults or split one, so the repair orders themselves govern. Do not abandon a claim or stop documenting repairs based on this output. Where a safety defect is involved, consider also reporting it to the vehicle safety regulator. Nothing you enter is stored.