#0121把每个模糊词换成一个数字Turn every vague word into a number

ScopeQ · 客户说「做个网站」ScopeQ · "Just build us a website"

「做个网站，简单的就行」——这句话里没有一个词是可以报价的。 把客户的原话贴进来（**原样贴，别整理**——整理过的版本里，模糊的地方已经被你自己脑补掉了），代码做两件确定的事： **一、逐词找出模糊量词。**「等等」「之类」「简单的」「先做个」「优化一下」「手机上也要能用」「改到满意为止」——每一处都标出来，并说明它将来会变成什么。这些词不是语气，是**未来的免费加班**，而且每一个都可以现在就换成一个数字或一份清单。 **二、按八个维度查覆盖度**：目标、交付物、范围边界、时间节点、预算付款、决策链与验收、素材与依赖、修改轮次。对方完全没提的那几维会被直接列出来，附上该问的具体问题。其中「决策链」和「素材依赖」最常被跳过，也最常导致延期——对接人不是拍板人时你会白做几版，客户素材晚两周工期照样算你头上。 最后是那一步最常被跳过的动作：**把口头澄清写成一封确认消息发回去**。它把「不包含什么」写下来（这比写清楚包含什么更防扯皮），对方确认的动作本身就是一次范围锁定，而且它**在报价之前就筛掉了那类不愿书面确认范围的客户**。 $2 解锁按项目类型的完整澄清问卷、可签字的需求 brief 模板、范围内／外清单与超范围计价条款。"Just build us a website, nothing fancy" contains not one quotable word. Paste what the client actually wrote — **unedited**, because the tidied version has already had the vagueness filled in by your own assumptions — and the code does two definite things. **One: it locates every vague quantifier.** "Et cetera", "simple", "just a first version", "polish it a bit", "should work on phones too", "revise until we're happy" — each flagged with what it becomes later. These aren't tone; they're **unpaid overtime**, and each can be converted right now into a number or a list. **Two: it checks coverage across eight dimensions** — purpose, deliverables, boundaries, dates, budget and payment, decision-maker and sign-off, assets and dependencies, revision rounds. Whatever the client never mentioned is listed with the questions to ask. Decision chain and asset dependencies are skipped most often and cause the most delay: when your contact isn't the decider you'll redo versions you never see reviewed, and when the client's assets arrive two weeks late the schedule is still your problem. Then the step almost everyone skips: **turn the answers into a confirmation message**. It puts what's excluded in writing (more protective than listing what's included), the act of confirming locks the scope, and it **filters out the clients who won't confirm a scope in writing — before you've quoted**. $2 unlocks the full questionnaire by project type, a sign-off-ready brief template, in/out scope lists and change-pricing clauses.

风险分与维度覆盖是本工具的粗口径参考（每处模糊记 8 分、每个缺失维度记 10 分），不代表项目实际风险，也不预测能不能顺利完成——它衡量的只是**你目前掌握的信息缺口**。模糊表述靠关键词匹配，会有漏判与误判；客户没用这些词不代表范围清晰。本工具不提供法律意见：需求 brief、范围条款与计价方式的效力以你与客户签署的合同为准，金额较大或涉及知识产权归属时建议由律师审阅。你填写的内容不入库——粘贴前请删除客户公司名、联系方式与任何保密信息。The risk score and coverage check are this tool's rough conventions (8 points per vague phrase, 10 per missing dimension). They do not measure real project risk or predict success — only the **information gap you currently have**. Vague-phrase detection is keyword-based and both misses and over-flags; an absence of these words does not mean the scope is clear. This is not legal advice: the effect of a brief, scope clause or pricing term depends on the contract you actually sign, and for significant amounts or IP ownership questions, have a lawyer review it. Nothing you enter is stored — remove client names, contact details and confidential information before pasting.